Dec 21 09

The New and Improved Mozy for Mac 1.6

by Dan

Of course, it can’t really be both new and improved. Logically, it has to be one or the other. It’s just that I’m excited about the 1.6 release of Mozy’s Mac client. It was finished last week and the response has been very positive.

It seems that with #Mozy for #Mac 1.6 it’s finally reliable. Awesome! — @donut2d

Latest Mozy update (1.6) on Mac OS X is a major improvement – it actually works, and doesn’t suck out all of your RAM. — @mmetcalfe

Our last few releases, while making improvements in many areas, seemed to have lingering and subtle problems. With the 1.6 version, we hope to have finally put them behind us.

We turned on auto-update today. If Mozy hasn’t updated itself yet, please feel free to grab the latest version of MozyHome (or MozyPro) and let us know what you think.

Official List of Changes

You can see the official list at the pages linked above. Mozy only makes the list of changes available for the current release, so I’ve copied them here for the future. You can see the changes in Mozy for Mac 1.4 and Mozy for Mac 1.5 too.

Enhancements

  • Removed dependency on Spotlight since Spotlight queries are unreliable under certain circumstances
  • Changes to backup selections are now saved automatically
  • Reduced memory usage
  • Decrease size of SupportFiles.zip file
  • Improved the performance of the Configuration window
  • Improved support for Snow Leopard and fixed issues caused by Snow Leopard’s 64-bit architecture
  • Improved interaction between Mozy’s preferences and Snow Leopard; Mozy’s preferences no longer require System Preferences to be re-started
  • Improved the use of temporary files
  • Improved reports in Admin Console for Pro users
  • Improved support of our external drive feature by addressing edge cases that can cause stability issues
  • Improved feedback when setting a preference to an invalid value
  • Improved error handling when an auto-update fails to download successfully
  • Added support for nine non-English languages
  • Added the ability to delete a Backup Set using the keyboard
  • Added the ability to undo and redo configuration changes
  • Added the ability to sort Backup Sets by file count or total size
  • Added history information to main Configuration window
  • Added “Install updates automatically” checkbox to dialog which prompts user to upgrade
  • Added ability to manually check for an update
  • Added ability to back up network drives using the NFS protocol for Pro users

Bug Fixes

  • Fixed issues which caused the “Show status in menu bar” preference to not work properly
  • Fixed the link in the Readme file for downloading the software
  • Fixed a computer name display issue in the Setup Assistant
  • Fixed an issue causing the Configuration window to crash when browsing a folder with lots of files
  • Fixed an issue which caused the file exclusion warning to not show up properly
  • Fixed an issue which caused network connection errors
  • Fixed an issue which caused several duplicate warning dialogs to appear
  • Fixed an issue which prevented the use of certain non-Roman characters in a password
  • Fixed an issue which caused a file to be accidentally excluded
  • Fixed an issue which caused the Backup Set Editor to display the wrong file size
  • Fixed an issue which caused files to be re-uploaded unnecessarily
  • Fixed an issue which caused files in Trash to be backed up

Languages

One of the two major changes in this release is support for nine languages in addition to American English:

  1. German
  2. Greek
  3. British English
  4. Castillian Spanish
  5. French
  6. Italian
  7. Dutch
  8. Portuguese
  9. Slovenian

If you have chosen one of those languages in System Preferences, Mozy will use it automatically. No assembly required. If you find spots where the translation doesn’t make sense, please let us know.

File Scanning

The other major change — the one I’m most excited about — is the new file scanning engine. This is how Mozy finds all your files and decides which ones to back up.

In the past, we’ve depended on Spotlight, Apple’s file scanning feature in OS X, for about half of our scanning. Backup Sets that searched for files of a certain type used Spotlight. Backup Sets that matched a folder (and selections made in the Files & Folders tab) scanned the hard drive directly. We kept finding that Spotlight returned inconsistent results in some cases. So we decided to stop using it.

While we were making the change, we simplified how things work and made everything but the initial scan much, much faster. Mozy now uses far less memory, even when backing up millions of files. There are still some improvements we want to make, but the new file scanning engine makes Mozy feel rock solid.

Conclusion

If you’ve gotten this far, thanks for reading. Please feel free to drop me a note (dan at mozy dot com) with any comments or suggestions. Oh, and Mozy for Mac 1.6 has two new easter eggs. :-)

If you’re new to Mozy, you can try our 2GB-for-free, no-strings-attached version here.

Dec 9 09

How to Optimize WordPress, Part 2

by Dan

My last post on how to optimize WordPress covered some general optimization techniques to speed up a website. Reducing HTTP requests, removing wasteful plugins and decreasing file sizes helped quite a bit. Now it’s time to try out page caching.

If you remember, the five things that normally occur for each page are:

  1. Initialize PHP
  2. Query the database
  3. Create the page
  4. Send the page
  5. Send additional files

Page caching plugins, like Hyper Cache and W3 Total Cache, eliminate steps two and three, except when creating a page the first time. WP Super Cache also cuts out step one.

All of the plugins were fairly easy to install. And I discovered during my tests that WP Super Cache, at least at Nearly Free Speech.NET, works just fine with safe mode on.

This graph shows the time it took to load my home page with each of the caching plugins enabled. I have circled the point where I first turned on page caching.

Graph showing response times with various caching plugs

Hyper Cache and WP Super Cache both performed well. W3 Total Cache seemed to struggle. It does more than page caching, like reformatting files to save space, but clearly slowed things down.

WP Super Cache has a few advantages over Hyper Cache:

  1. It supports browser caching better
  2. It doesn’t need to load PHP
  3. It checks for security problems and suggests fixes

So I am now a happy WP Super Cache user.

UPDATE 2009-12-28:

After a few days, I started having issues with WP Super Cache and switched back to Hyper Cache. You can see how the irregularities went away. I’ve been using Hyper Cache for almost a week now, and things have remained stable.

Graph of WP Super Cache irregularities that were solved by changing back to Hyper Cache

After being contacted by the author of the W3 Total Cache plugin, I’ve agreed to give it another try. I turned off all the settings except for “disk enhanced” page caching. I’ll update the article again in a few days.

UPDATE 2010-01-04:

After looking into things a bit more, my results are still showing Hyper Cache to be faster than W3 Total Cache. However, when I test using the curl command line tool from home, it seems that both plugins are about the same speed. My web hosting company uses a network-level reverse proxy and a few other caching tricks that eliminate the need for some of the features provided by these types of plugins. I’m not sure what’s going on here, but will be sticking with Hyper Cache for now since it appears to work better with my particular situation.

I do like that W3 Total Cache handles page compression properly. I could not get page compression to work with Hyper Cache and had to turn it off. I’d recommend you try all three plugins and measure which works best for you.

Nov 27 09

How to Optimize WordPress

by Dan

Having lived with WordPress for 8 months, I decided to see if I could improve the performance of my website. There are lots of things to fix.

For each page of my website, WordPress normally does the following:

  1. Initialize PHP, which is the programming language WordPress is written in.
  2. Read information out of the database.
  3. Translate the information into HTML.
  4. Send the HTML to the web browser.
  5. Send additional files needed to view the page.

One major cause of WordPress slowness is #2. Reading all that information can take several seconds per page. I installed a plugin called DB Cache Reloaded to help figure out what was going on. If you view the source of my home page, you’ll see something like the following:

<!– 1.549 seconds, 30 uncached queries, 0 cached queries, 10.76MB memory used –>

This tells me that there are 30 database queries just to show my home page. That’s a lot of slowness. You can also see how many seconds it took to generate the page, which is how long #2 plus #3 took.

The DB Cache Reloaded plugin works by remembering the result of each database query and, in the future, using the previous result instead of re-reading it from the database. With this turned on, about 2/3rds of the database queries are avoided.

<!– 1.236 seconds, 10 uncached queries, 20 cached queries, 10.76MB memory used –>

I also discovered that the KB Robots plugin makes a database query for every page on my site. Wasteful. Since my robots.txt file is simple, I removed the plugin and just created the file myself. One less query.

To speed up #3, I explored the idea of using a plugin to cache whole HTML pages. The most popular seem to be WP Super Cache, Hyper Cache and W3 Total Cache. Since none of them work WP Super Cache does not work when PHP is running in safe mode, I’m going to try them another time. But the performance improvement should be big because, these plugins allow me to skip #2 and #3. WP Super Cache will also skip #1.

Another point of improvement is reducing the number of things a browser has to download in order to show my site (#4). Most browsers will first download the page itself. Then if additional files are needed, such as pictures, style sheets or scripts, it will download them two at a time. When there are a lot of extra files, the overhead of downloading them can add up quickly. A caching plugin will not help out here.

Though I really liked my original WordPress theme, called Panorama, it uses a lot of extra files. They aren’t very big, but when downloaded two at a time they slow things down quite a bit.

Using a web page analyizer, I investigated how much work a browser has to do to download the files needed to display my website. The following table highlights the differences between my old theme and my new one, Titan, which uses about half the number of files (10 vs 22).

Panorama     Titan
HTML11
HTML Images52
CSS Images82
Scripts53
CSS imports32
Frames00
HTTP Requests2210
Size (KB)266240
DB Queries3032


Eliminating those small files (or combining several into one) makes a measurable difference. On the day I was testing, the average time to download my page dropped from four seconds down to two.

However, notice that the number of database queries is higher now. I believe this is because of all the options the Titan theme makes available. There were originally 35 queries, but Titan includes analytics, a box in the sidebar, and a category listing in the footer. So by using the theme options instead of separate plugins for each of those things, I was able to save 3 queries. And despite the small increase in database queries, my site still feels much faster.

One last thing I tried is removing some widgets from my sidebar. I put in a new archives section, using years instead of months, that I maintain manually. I will have to update it once each year, but it reduced the size of the page slightly and eliminated a database query. Lots of small and simple improvements can really add up.

Each of my remaining sidebar sections — Popular, Recent and Random — take about a fifth of the total time to create the page (#3). Taking them out would speed things up. But I like having them to help people find other articles to read they might find interesting.

The last point to mention is the plugin I use to find related posts. I really like having these suggestions for further reading. However, most of these types of plugins are really slow because they calculate “relatedness” each time a page is loaded. Wasteful.

I’ve found one that pre-calculates related pages every time an article is created or edited, but it is based on tags rather than the full article content. And I haven’t been tagging things. I tried some auto-tagging plugins, but could not find one that seemed to work well. So until I can get around to tagging all my articles, I’ll have to wait on that.

Overall, I am pleased with the results so far. I’m going back to tag my articles so that I can try out the new related posts plugin. Then I’m going to see about turning off PHP’s safe mode and turning on page caching.

UPDATE: I’ve written a Part 2 about my experience with caching plugins. You can read it here.